The Rising Pattern of Unnecessary Force by Police

The use of force by police has become a contentious issue in the United States, with a growing number of incidents sparking widespread outrage and calls for reform. According to a report by the National Institute of Justice, "police use of force is a complex issue that involves a range of factors, including officer training, departmental policies, and community expectations" (National Institute of Justice 12). One aspect of this issue that has garnered significant attention is the rising pattern of unnecessary force by police.


Unnecessary force incidents can have severe consequences, including physical harm to individuals, erosion of community trust, and increased liability for police departments. A study by the Journal of Police and Criminial Psychology found that "excessive force can lead to a range of negative outcomes, including increased citizen complaints, decreased community trust, and increased officer stress" (Journal of Police and Criminial Psychology 23). Furthermore, unnecessary force incidents can undermine the legitimacy of law enforcement in the eyes of the public, leading to decreased cooperation and increased tensions.


Research has identified several factors that contribute to unnecessary force incidents, including inadequate training, poor departmental policies, and a lack of accountability. According to a report by the American Civil Liberties Union, "police departments that prioritize militarization and aggressive policing are more likely to experience unnecessary force incidents" (American Civil Liberties Union 15). Additionally, a study by the Police Executive Research Forum found that "departments that emphasize community policing and de-escalation techniques are less likely to experience unnecessary force incidents" (Police Executive Research Forum 20).


To address the issue of unnecessary force, police departments can implement a range of solutions, including de-escalation training, body cameras, and community engagement. According to a report by the National Institute of Justice, "de-escalation training can help officers manage complex situations and reduce the likelihood of unnecessary force incidents" (National Institute of Justice 25). Additionally, body cameras can increase transparency and accountability, helping to reduce unnecessary force incidents.


The rising pattern of unnecessary force by police is a complex issue that requires a multifaceted solution. By addressing the root causes of unnecessary force, implementing effective solutions, and prioritizing community trust and accountability, law enforcement agencies can work towards reducing unnecessary force incidents and improving relationships with the public.


*Source Bibliography:*


- National Institute of Justice. "Police Use of Force." National Institute of Justice, 2020.

- Journal of Police and Criminial Psychology. "The Impact of Excessive Force on Police-Community Relations." Journal of Police and Criminial Psychology, vol. 25, no. 1, 2010, pp. 20-30.

- American Civil Liberties Union. "The War on Drugs and Police Militarization." American Civil Liberties Union, 2014.

- Police Executive Research Forum. "De-Escalation Techniques: A Practical Guide for Police Officers." Police Executive Research Forum, 2017.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When Duty Collided with Conscience

Image
On July 1, 2026, Air Force Major Jason Watson made a decision that will likely define the rest of his military career. While wearing his Air Force service uniform, he stood on the steps of the U.S. Capitol holding a sign calling for the impeachment, conviction, and removal of President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance. He also publicly criticized the administration's military actions, saying he believed they were unconstitutional. By his own statements, Watson believed he had a moral duty to speak out. He knew there would probably be consequences, but he chose to protest anyway as an act of civil disobedience. One thing that has confused a lot of people is why he was arrested. Some have said he had permission to be there and then somehow lost it. That's not exactly what happened. Representative Al Green escorted Watson onto the House steps. Under Capitol rules, demonstrations are allowed there only under certain conditions, including when a member of Congres...
Read more

Trump’s Iran Strikes: Unconstitutional, Dangerous, and a Christian Call for Accountability

Donald Trump has proven to be a dangerously impulsive leader, and his recent actions reveal a pattern of narcissistic decision-making that puts the country and the world at risk. From unilateral military strikes to flouting constitutional processes, his behavior demonstrates a disregard for law, accountability, and the perspectives of allies. Leadership of this magnitude demands wisdom, restraint, and a commitment to the rule of law — qualities Trump has repeatedly shown he cannot exercise responsibly. For the safety and stability of the nation, he must be removed from the office of the President of the United States as quickly as possible, along with enablers like JD Vance and Mike Johnson, whose support empowers these reckless tendencies. Donald Trump — in the name of the United States — recently launched military strikes against Iran, escalating a conflict that already threatens global stability and regional security. These actions were taken without formal authorization from Congre...
Read more

DHS’s Subpoena Campaign Threatens First Amendment Freedoms

In a constitutional federal representative democracy like the USA, government officials are supposed to protect the rights of the people, not intimidate them. Yet the Department of Homeland Security, under the leadership of Secretary Kristi Noem, is aggressively trying to identify Americans who criticize ICE and its enforcement actions. This is not just an overreach; it is a direct attack on the First Amendment. DHS has issued hundreds of administrative subpoenas to major tech platforms, including Google, Meta, Reddit, and Discord, demanding the names, email addresses, and other identifying information of users who post critical content about ICE¹. These subpoenas do not require prior judicial approval, allowing the agency to bypass the usual legal safeguards and target critics with alarming impunity². This is an abuse of bureaucratic power, and it chills dissent. First Amendment law clearly protects both speech and the anonymity of speakers. Courts have repeatedly emphasized that anon...
Read more